18 Major Generals file plea against lower pension than juniors; AFT seeks explanation from govt

The officers are claiming parity in pay and pension with officers of the rank of Brigadier

Taking up a petition filed jointly by 18 officers of the rank of Major General, drawing pension lower than their juniors, the Armed Forces Tribunal on Wednesday, Jan 12,  sought an explanation from the Ministry of Defence and the pension disbursing authorities.

“The Tribunal’s bench comprising Justice Rajendra Menon and Lt Gen PM Hariz admitted the petition for final adjudication and asked the government and the Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Officers) to show cause as to why the petition should not be allowed,” Col Indra Sen Singh (retd), counsel for the petitioners said.

The officers are claiming parity in pay and pension with officers of the rank of Brigadier.

The situation has arisen due to the Military Service Pay (MSP) which was introduced in the Sixth and Seventh Central Pay Commission (CPC) as part of basic pay of officers of the three services up to and including the rank of Brigadier and equivalent ranks in other services. Officers of the rank of Major General and above are not entitled to MSP.

As a result, a Major General and equivalent rank officer in the Air Force and Navy, after being promoted to the said rank, get lesser pay than Brigadier. Consequently their pension after retirement is lesser too.

“This is against the fundamental canon of service jurisprudence. A senior rank official cannot be paid less salary than his junior in the same branch or service,” Col Singh said. “Army Headquarters is aware of this pay and pension anomaly and has, admittedly, already taken up a case with the defence ministry to resolve the anomaly, but to no avail so far,” he added.

In two recent consecutive cases filed by officers of the rank of Air Vice Marshall (equivalent to of Major General), the Tribunal has already allowed their plea and directed the government to enhance their pay at par with that of Air Commodore (equivalent to Brigadier) and also upgrade their pension accordingly.

“However, the government has treated the two judgements as ‘Judgement-in-personam’ and not as ‘Judgement-in-rem’, which implies that it is applicable to the individual petitioner and not to all similarly circumstanced personnel,” Col Singh told The Tribune. 

“This is contrary to the law as laid down by the Supreme Court in a number of judgements that once a judgement is passed and gains finality then the benefit of the same should be extended to all similarly situated individuals or groups without forcing them to knock at the doors of the courts separately,” he added.

************************************************************************

Readers

These are extraordinary times. All of us have to rely on high-impact, trustworthy journalism. And this is especially true of the Indian Diaspora. Members of the Indian community overseas cannot be fed with inaccurate news.

Pravasi Samwad is a venture that has no shareholders. It is the result of an impassioned initiative of a handful of Indian journalists spread around the world.  We have taken the small step forward with the pledge to provide news with accuracy, free from political and commercial influence. Our aim is to keep you, our readers, informed about developments at ‘home’ and across the world that affect you.

Please help us to keep our journalism independent and free.

In these difficult times, to run a news website requires finances. While every contribution, big or small, will makes a difference, we request our readers to put us in touch with advertisers worldwide. It will be a great help.

For more information: pravasisamwad00@gmail.com