“Why shouldn’t a talented person come here and contribute to our economy? My husband, who is an immigrant himself, grew and successfully sold a multi-million-pound business a few years ago. I fail to see the issue with welcoming individuals who can make such positive contributions.”
— Nichi Hodgson
A heated debate unfolded on GB News on September 8, sparking intense discussions about the rumored plan of Rishi Sunak, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, to issue thousands of work visas to Indian citizens as part of efforts to secure a post-Brexit trade agreement with India, as reported by gbnews.com.
Peter Whittle, the Director of New Culture Forum, and commentator Nichi Hodgson joined presenters Martin Daubney and Ellie Costello on Britain’s Newsroom to express their contrasting views on this proposed visa initiative.
Hodgson began by defending the idea of allowing talented individuals to come to the UK for training and work, drawing from her personal experience as someone married to an immigrant with a diverse family background. She stated, “Why shouldn’t a talented person come here and contribute to our economy? My husband, who is an immigrant himself, grew and successfully sold a multi-million-pound business a few years ago. I fail to see the issue with welcoming individuals who can make such positive contributions.”
The debate touched upon complex issues of immigration, cultural identity, and national diversity, reflecting the broader discourse surrounding immigration policies and their implications for modern societies
In response, Whittle argued that there are concerns beyond economic considerations. He emphasized that a country is not merely a financial balance sheet but also a cultural and national entity. He questioned whether the logic of increased immigration numbers, as suggested by Hodgson, should be taken even further, asking, “If we follow your logic, Nichi, why stop at 700,000 when we had 600,000 net immigrants last year?”
Hodgson countered by highlighting the benefits of diversity and inclusivity, saying, “What is fundamentally wrong with having people of different colors, ethnicities, and cultures in our country? It sounds like you want to preserve Britain exclusively for what you define as the ‘British people.’ But there is no single definition of the British people. For centuries, we have been a diverse nation shaped by numerous invasions, resulting in a rich ethnic mix. Are you suggesting that anyone with a different skin color should be kept out?”
The debate touched upon complex issues of immigration, cultural identity, and national diversity, reflecting the broader discourse surrounding immigration policies and their implications for modern societies.
****************************************************
Readers
These are extraordinary times. All of us have to rely on high-impact, trustworthy journalism. And this is especially true of the Indian Diaspora. Members of the Indian community overseas cannot be fed with inaccurate news.
Pravasi Samwad is a venture that has no shareholders. It is the result of an impassioned initiative of a handful of Indian journalists spread around the world. We have taken the small step forward with the pledge to provide news with accuracy, free from political and commercial influence. Our aim is to keep you, our readers, informed about developments at ‘home’ and across the world that affect you.
Please help us to keep our journalism independent and free.
In these difficult times, to run a news website requires finances. While every contribution, big or small, will makes a difference, we request our readers to put us in touch with advertisers worldwide. It will be a great help.
For more information: pravasisamwad00@gmail.com