Friday, May 3, 2024
spot_img

Complaint against Infosys in US for discrimination

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 7 rejected Infosys’ motion to dismiss the suit filed by Prejean for retaliatory termination and a hostile work environment

PRAVASISAMWAD.COM

Jill Prejean, a former Vice President of talent acquisition at Infosys told a US court that she was asked by the Bengaluru-headquartered IT company to avoid hiring people of Indian origin, women with children at home and candidates aged 50 or above.

This was the second time that Infosys faces allegations of discrimination in hiring practices in the US. The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 7 rejected Infosys’ motion to dismiss the suit filed by Prejean for retaliatory termination and a hostile work environment. Prejean filed suit against Infosys, former senior VP and head of consulting Mark Livingston, and former partners Dan Albright and Jerry Kurtz.

The court also asked the defendants to submit their replies to the accusations within 21 days from the date of order on September 30

Alleging unjust termination, the former Infosys VP in her suit said that company partners Kurtz and Albright “turned hostile” towards her when she objected to comply with illegal demands for hiring senior executives for the company.

The plaintiff was hired to recruit “hard-to-find executives” to work as partners or VPs in the consulting division of the firm. She was 59 when she was hired for the job in 2018. According to her complaint, “she was shocked to find a rampant culture of illegal discriminatory animus among the partner level executives based on age, gender and caregiver status.”

The complaint further mentioned that Prejean “tried to change this culture within the first two months of her employment” but was met with “resistance from Infosys partners – Jerry Kurtz and Dan Albright – who became hostile in the face of her objections and tried to circumvent her authority to evade compliance with the law”, according to a report in ET.

The complaint further mentions that the biases violated New York City Human Rights Laws and cost Prejean her job.

The court also asked the defendants to submit their replies to the accusations within 21 days from the date of order on September 30, reported the Economic Times.

*********************************************************************

Readers

These are extraordinary times. All of us have to rely on high-impact, trustworthy journalism. And this is especially true of the Indian Diaspora. Members of the Indian community overseas cannot be fed with inaccurate news.

Pravasi Samwad is a venture that has no shareholders. It is the result of an impassioned initiative of a handful of Indian journalists spread around the world.  We have taken the small step forward with the pledge to provide news with accuracy, free from political and commercial influence. Our aim is to keep you, our readers, informed about developments at ‘home’ and across the world that affect you.

Please help us to keep our journalism independent and free.

In these difficult times, to run a news website requires finances. While every contribution, big or small, will makes a difference, we request our readers to put us in touch with advertisers worldwide. It will be a great help.

For more information: pravasisamwad00@gmail.com

Gyanendra
Gyanendra
(Gyanendra has been teaching and writing for the last 15 years. His passion for teaching keeps him engaged. He keeps a keen interest in Sports and Current Affairs.)

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -

EDITOR'S CHOICE

Register Here to Nominate