The judgement has wide implication for SSCOs of the defence forces, who have an initial contractual obligation of 10 years’ service, extendable by a further four years
Chandigarh: The Armed Forces Tribunal has held that all short service commission officers (SSCOs) not selected for permanent commission, but are otherwise considered fit, will be granted extension in service, a special report by Vijay Mohan of The Tribune, Chandigarh, says.
Allowing the plea of a woman SSCO. denied permanent commission or extension in service after the initial period of 10 years, the Tribunal observed that “grant of extension of service is not contingent upon vacancy”.
The judgement has wide implication for SSCOs in the defence forces, who have an initial contractual obligation of 10 years’ service, extendable by a further four years. On opting for it, SSCOs cases come up for review by a selection board for grant of permanent commission, on completion of 10 years’ service or four years extension.
The concerned officer had averred inconsistencies in assessment and processing of her confidential reports for a particular period. She contended that though the competent authority had expunged the complete assessment of the senior reviewing officer in the said report, the reviewing officer’s assessment, which was equally bad in law and suffered from bias and subjectivity, continued to remain on record, thus resulting in her rejection despite her overall high grading.
“The relevant Army Order states that those SSCO’s who are not selected for permanent commission but otherwise considered fit and suitable and are willing for the same, will be granted extension in service,” the officer’s counsel, Col Indra Sen Singh (retd) contended.
“This judgement is of great significance for all SSCOs who opt for extension in service but are denied the same for one reason or the other,” he added.
The Tribunal’s bench comprising Justice Rajendra Menon and Lt Gen CP Mohanty has directed the Central Government to reinstate the woman SSCO in service and grant her four years of extension of service with all consequential benefits.
“We find no reason why the petitioner should not have been considered for extension since she fulfils the criteria of being an optee and by error of judgement declared unfit for retention by the selection board,” the Bench ruled.
The Tribunal further ordered that after reinstatement, she will be considered for grant of permanent commission afresh with her revised profile and if found within the laid down merit criteria, will be granted permanent commission without any loss of seniority.
***********************************************************
Readers
These are extraordinary times. All of us have to rely on high-impact, trustworthy journalism. And this is especially true of the Indian Diaspora. Members of the Indian community overseas cannot be fed with inaccurate news.
Pravasi Samwad is a venture that has no shareholders. It is the result of an impassioned initiative of a handful of Indian journalists spread around the world. We have taken the small step forward with the pledge to provide news with accuracy, free from political and commercial influence. Our aim is to keep you, our readers, informed about developments at ‘home’ and across the world that affect you.
Please help us to keep our journalism independent and free.
In these difficult times, to run a news website requires finances. While every contribution, big or small, will makes a difference, we request our readers to put us in touch with advertisers worldwide. It will be a great help.
For more information: pravasisamwad00@gmail.com